I tested the downloadable binary artifact both with an old 1.4.2_01 and with 1.5.0_06 under windows.
Stefano Bernd Fondermann wrote: > I guess we would rather need j1.4 binaries to avoid those nasty "Major > Version 49 not supported" errors > > Bernd > > On 9/12/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hmm strange. Here is my version info: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/james-2.3.0rc3# java -version >> java version "1.5.0_05" >> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_05-b05) >> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_05-b05, mixed mode) >> >> >> Am Dienstag, den 12.09.2006, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: >> > +1 >> > >> > But I am curious as to what you used to compile it. I've compiled >> with JDK >> > 1.4.2_09 and JDK 1.5.0_06, and the resulting file sizes are >> different in all >> > three cases (the two I built and the one you built). >> > >> > --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
