this deprecation is different than the typical one: we don't have a complete feature which is replaced by another/better one, in this case, it was never really a full feature.
but we can wait one release or two, no problem. Bernd On 9/17/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote: > JamesMBean: can't we simply drop it in trunk? it was a stub and is no > longer needed. > > Bernd We didn't remove anything deprecated yet, so I think we can wait until the decision that this code will finish in a major release will be taken: at that point we should review every deprecation we have and decide wether to remove it or not. WDYT? Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
