[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-24?page=comments#action_12437270 ] Guillermo Grandes commented on JSPF-24: ---------------------------------------
(theater) ohh that sadness is mine. They don't like my patches... That I am going to do?, I me will become shepherd! :-P well, the idea is what counts :-) in fact only are 2 important changes, the rest is straw. (excuse me, it is what it has been devised in a while of time that I have been able to dedicate to him) you change what you want, is only one contribution, a sand grain... it was for to give them push to the problem :-) "synchronized", I forgot it, I take note of that :-) I thank for the commentaries :-) > Handle of non configured SPF domains with default SPF record > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JSPF-24 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-24 > Project: jSPF > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: jSPF 0.9b2 > Reporter: Guillermo Grandes > Assigned To: Norman Maurer > Attachments: SPF.java.diff > > > Use the best guess SPF record when one cannot be found in the DNS. Note that > this can only return pass or neutral. > example best_guess: "v=spf1 a/24 mx/24 ptr ?all" > This improvement is not standard, but Google uses it (cannot be bad) ;-) > The idea is that the use of this improvement and the policy that is used by > default can initialize, to even force the use of a local_policy (just in case > the request were arriving to us from an internal network 10.0.0.0/8 for > example) > See also: > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF-Query/lib/Mail/SPF/Query.pm#NON-STANDARD_FEATURES -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]