Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I've been unable to test RC3 and, as a consequence, I did not vote on it.
So I feel I am not in a comfortable position to put up a vote.
But, seriously, why wait any longer?
RC3 has been published
(http://people.apache.org/dist/james/server/binaries/) even if we,
maybe, never announced it! We at least changed the homepage to reflect
the news.
Are you talking about the final release?
In roadmap for the 2.3.0 final we have:
Fix m2 projects to not lookup dependencies on ibiblio, to simplify the
website build and to include 2.2.0 and 2.3.0 docs
- http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-634
Move server-site documents from james/server repository to
james/site/server repository
- http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-618
Invalid (outdated) urls in config files.
- http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-626
I think I'll take care of the 3 above in the next couple of days: I'm
waiting to close the vote about the m2 site changes (I'll close it later
today by lazy consensus).
We would also have more feedback on the leak issue opened by Noel: I'm
not fine releasing a 2.3.0 final with an unknown leak issue opened in
JIRA. Either we decide this is not confirmed and close it until we can
confirm it, or we investigate on the cause of the leak. Until now we
don't know if the leak is confirmed to be in james or is confirmed to be
somewhere else (JVM/connectorj). PS: one of my production james
(something near rc2) is up since 1 month and with a default Xmx (64MB)
and I had no OOM (this is an almost default 2.3 configuration with file
repositories).
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
