mmm, Good, for anything like FixMissingBrackets we need add a
setCommandArgument in SMTPSession to rewrite/intercept the Argument parsed
by core MAIL/RCPT without polute the main code, right?. (seems like
(org.apache.mailet.Mail) setState())
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <server-dev@james.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 7:51 PM
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-642) Mail Address Error : Did not
start and end with < > (brackets) - Compatibility leak
Guillermo Grandes wrote:
if we forced users with strict things (all are not programmers), what
happens?
There is incentive for defective products to be corrected. If everyone bows
down to the defective implementors, there is no reason to implement
standards correctly. Compliance should be strict.
However, I'm aware that not all defective products can be corrected, due to
the lack of care from their implementors, lack of those implementors still
existing, and/or lack of available source code for users to correct the
defects.
So if someone really needs for a filter to support bogus client products,
there is a way to insert it into JAMES without polluting core code.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
