Guillermo Grandes wrote:
[I think that supporting a relaxed interpretation is MUCH MORE
difficult]
Yes, I know,... the life is thus.
You trucated the line. This way make no sense.
I said that supporting the relaxed intepretation was much more difficult
than supporting 8bitmime that is an rfc spec and would have probably
solved your problem anyway. But this was only a consideration: I don't
have time to work on any of this issue now.
Have sense, all is difficult, all depends/question of time, "more things,
few time"..., I understand, we will see that we can do :-)
I just updated javamail to 1.4.1ea-SNAPSHOT from 15/Sep/2006 and
decommented all of the previously disabled 8bitmime support code and
tests seems to pass now.
You can find a binary build of the current trunk here:
http://jamesdev.void.it:8080/continuum/servlet/browse?file=10/dist/james-3.0-dev/downloads/bin/james-binary-3.0-dev.zip
Please let me know if you are able to test this and what are the results.
[...]
I see that project glassfish started to fix a few of the bugs I reported
against javamail: imho it worth investigating more on this as soon as
they
will release a new beta.
Agreed. :-)
Thanks.
Guillermo
I checked the glassfish project and I found that they already released a
new beta a couple of weeks ago, so I ran a few tests and updated our
code to test it: the result is the build above.
Hope this fix you issue,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
