works like a charm! :-) Bernd
On 10/2/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano, thanx very much! :-) I am eager to try this out. Bernd On 10/1/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > I think this was a bug in postage and I think I just fixed it. > Please review my changes. > > Stefano > > Bernd Fondermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Last night I ran the "release" scenario against RC4 with the current > > Postage trunk. > > The overall result has not changed from prev Server RCs. All test > > mails were matched. > > > > But, as you might have noticed, Postage has a new mechanism to inspect > > the mails it matches called validation. In our case (the default), > > this is simply comparing the in/out sizes of both the binary and > > textual mime parts. So, it is not looking at headers or so, only at > > the 'load' data. > > > > Mostly they match but in 10% of the cases they don't. The sizes of the > > binary mime part is greater than expected. If validation fails, its > > always mail received internally and fetched with POP3, never through > > SMTP. > > > > Maybe its a bug in Postage, maybe in James, maybe not a bug at all. I > > have no time to investigate more on the weekend. > > So I'd like to ask if somebody can try to reproduce or give a hint > > where the problem might be. > > I am planning to continue working on this problem starting Monday. > > > > > > Bernd > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
