Noel J. Bergman wrote:
A POLL thread is NOT a VOTE thread. Yes, I do read all JAMES e-mail, but it
is entirely rude to have vote threads that are not identified as such. I
had to dig through a lot of e-mail this morning to find that there even WAS
a vote, and only after Norman told me to look. If he hadn't have pinged me,
I likely would not have gotten to this until tomorrow, since I'm traveling
to ApacheCon today.
Of course a POLL is not a vote, and if you read the content of the
message the intent of this thread was not to decide wether to remove or
not this thing. I'm simply trying to understand the different positions
to be able to start a vote later.
If I start a VOTE you say we should discuss it first, if I start a POLL
you convert a piece of it into a POLL.
I really don't understand you. Ever.
Either way before making a next release I (or Norman) would have started
a vote so this is a non-problem.
+1 after having removed MBox class at least from the config (I don't
care to remove the file, my vote does not change in this regard)
-1 to removing the code
Absolutely not. I use that code. I have processed gigabytes worth of
messages through that code. For two years, that code was used to process
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail. Yes, it appears that there are defects in store
and with empty files, but when used to import messages from mbox
repositories into JAMES, it works.
--- Noel
BUT this was a poll and not a vote.
Since when people start a VOTE with a -1??? I never heard of such things
at ASF.
Please tell your opinion about the 2.3.0 release plan if you don't want
to make us loose too much time starting a vote that you will veto.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
