Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Am Samstag, den 07.10.2006, 14:18 +0100 schrieb robert burrell donkin:
Do we need Joachim to sign a Software Grant
(http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) for this?
If he not publish it yet as official release we not need this..
correct
me if im wrong..
it's a substantial work developed outside apache so it's best to have
a software grant on record. the process is detailed at
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html and is reasonably
smooth now.
Can we start in the sandbox?
This should be confirmed by someone with more knowledge of the ASF
rules, but following incubator I think that we can start with the svn
work and in the mean time complete the IP-clearance issues.
If this is not true, please anyone tell something NOW ;-)
If even a API proposal + prototype + bugfixing/refactoring is
"substantial work" we have to do ALL our private experiments in the
sandbox to avoid later expenses and inconvenience.
I agree.
What is our current policy concerning the sandbox? Do we need to vote to
create a branch/subproject there?
No, we don't need it.
you can create a branch in james/server/sandbox/imap-integration (or
any other name making sense for you) and start integrating your code.
Maybe it would be better I would do my OSGi experiments in the
sandbox...
+1 we would have much more visibility on the tests.
again "james/server/sandbox/osgi-experiments" or something similar can
be a good candidate for this.
Stefano
just go ahead joachim ;-)
bye
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
