Re: [VOTE] Non compliance disclaimer (was: Change in policy to for JAMES to violate RFCs)

[Danny Angus]

On 10/9/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

So any suggestion about how the "shorter version" should be lookin ?

"The feature documented here permits James to handle messages which do
  not comply with the following standards which James claims to implement:

  RFC XXXX para Y.Y

Please read http://wiki.apache.org/james/StandardsComplianceStatement";

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]