Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bernd (or anyone else feeling like working on this),
As I'm working on the revised I/O handling, I've been paying attention to
issues related to pipelining. Would you please make sure that we have some
tests to validate proper behavior for RFC 2920?
Also, we currently show RFC 2197 as the RFC for pipelining, but that has
been superceded by RFC 2920, so we should update the web site and ensure our
compliance with the latest revision.
From a fast review of the RFC I can't see protocol differences between
this and the previous specification.
As a note the RFC does not require that the buffers are handled
correctly also after the DATA command, but our current implementation is
able to recieve the full conversation in a single buffer: this is really
useful while testing. IIRC the RFC require the client to flush and read
the replies after the DATA.
Likewise, we list RFC 1830, which has been superceded by RFC 3030, although
we do not declare (or implement) it. Does anyone know if RFC 3030 is widely
implemented?
ref: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3030.txt
http://fortytwo.ch/smtp
From this link it seems that only Microsoft support this rfc.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
