Norman Maurer wrote:
> Commit which noel made:
> +0 Cause i not see a big problem in it . We have the problems with
> couple services anyway in 2.3
Exactly.
> Backport the complex one from trunk:
> + 1 Cause it is the better "solution" even it can intruduce more
> problems cause it is a "big" patch.
I wouldn't mind, but it is a couple of hours of work to do the whole thing
right (and more code change == more risk). That seems a waste, since the
branch will (hopefully) be dead-ended. Also, there is a problem with it:
unless the user removes assembly.xml, JAMES won't restart. The patch I did is
entirely compatible with v2.3.0, including the existing XML, and is a drop-in
for the current SAR file.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
