On 11/5/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is just the silly nomenclature problem. Next Minor should be v2.4, since v2.3.x would be just a v2.3 bug fix. Next Major should be v3.0. But since we haven't agreed on the version names, we're constantly running afoul of them.
Right then. *Please* create a proposal, and a vote thread for an approach to naming/numbering and log them in the STATUS file. Then (no matter *what* we decide) we can at least record what we decided and stick to it. This is too much of a Pain in the Arse to let it continue much longer. How on earth can we be expected to plan anything properly if we can't even agree how to refer to things when we discuss them. :-) d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
