On 11/7/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> I understand from this message that you instead are +0 on next-major
>> (with the additional doubts about feasibility) and +1 on working on
>> next-greater. I hope the other voters understood better the vote and
>> they don't think that Mar 2007 for next-major is unrealistic, otherwise
>> we have a problem in our voting process.
>
> No. My vote stands. With the exception of the release date.
> It really doesn't matter if it is ready March or July or September.
>
> What's important for me is: to work on trunk and keep compatibility.
> I am sure you are not saying that if I don't commit myself to a date,
> I cannot work on it.
You can work on it, but you should be aware that there is someone
committed to that date and (if I thought this is what we voted, but we
should probably discuss again and confirm this) that after that date
your work on trunk won't be included on next-major but the following
release.
Are there any hidden dependencies I don't know about that are forcing
you to release in March?
Please cool down. What will be included in a release is a community
decision. It is not done months before - by just setting a date.
I know you only commit working and functional code, so it should be
really an issue to you.
It isn't. Please, don't try to threaten me because of this date.
I proposed to work on a time based roadmap instead of a feature based
roadmap because it seemed to me the best compromise between the member
goals, and because I think this is more "challenging" (Am I using
existing words? ;-) )
Once again, I think it is good to have a time frame perspective.
Depending on the features set, it could be realistic or not. No need
to waste time about, right now.
I simply read 5 times the whole "JAMES 2.4 Road Map" thread and other
threads used to discuss the roadmap and created a vote and a roadmap
that imho is feasible: we can't discuss 2 months to decide what should
be included in a release we want to publish in 2 months.
Yeah. But you are the one who is re-iterating all this discussions. I
just said, that your "hard date" for me is a "soft date". What is it
that makes you kind of angry about that?
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
