Hi Noel, it is silly to think, that one has to change the source tree, or anything, so one can build JAMES using an IDE. Your Arguments show me that you are trying to defend yourself because you are not using such a tool. The question is "why?" No one on this list is telling you to use one, nor telling you that they are so much better. You asked if it is possible to run one single Unit Test.
People just keep telling you how easy they run it from within the IDE or maven. If you do not like it, do not use it, it's that easy. But please stop complaining about how long Unit Tests take, and about how hard it is to find a solution to your problem. And thanks for the link about a person switching from eclipse back to emacs. We have a developer in our company, who was coding his whole life with xemacs, and is now happily using eclipse. There was an article not so long ago about a formerly german xemacs evangelist, using eclipse happily now too. What does all of this say? Nothing, correct. It all boils down to personal likings and dislikings. One more thought I have about maven vs. ant. All maven is trying to do, is to pre-define a common project layout. No one hinders you to *not* use it. If you do not like the directory layout, you have to do some more configuration inside the main configuration file. Maven gives you so many tools out of the box. If you still cannot find what you are looking for, you can script your own goals and targets just like within ant. The developers over at maven even found a way to solve complaints about other developers stating that "ant" is shorter to type than "maven". If you cannot find any sense in using it, other developers can. And that is fine. But saying, to change my project layout into a common one, which helps new developers find their way around in the project, just because I do not want to, or I cannot see why this would be a benefit, is just as silly as to say the Hell with RFC's and JSR's. One more thing about the memory leak. First, I am happy you were proven and found, and fixed the bug. But I would be more happy if there was an automated test exposing the bug before fixing it. As is stated on: http://clarkware.com/articles/JUnitPrimer.html -> Testing Idioms -> "When a bug is reported, write a test to expose the bug." For simulating simultaneous connections, maybe this test lib could be of use: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-contest.html Just my 2 Cents Juergen -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 23:17 An: James Developers List Betreff: RE: Emacs and Eclipse Steve Brewin wrote: > DISCLAIMER: I've no interest of getting involved in IDE wars Neither do I. My arguement is that we shouldn't bias the project to require such silly things. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] !EXCUBATOR:1,45579d3a53072113911542! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
