On 11/18/06, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Samstag, den 18.11.2006, 08:53 +0000 schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> > Imho it is really interesting to see that in jdk 1.5 the string
> > concatenation is replaced by StringBuilder by default and this way is
> > even better than using the StringBuffer.
>
> perhaps one plan would be to factor out logging calls into a
> JamesLogEnabled class. the idea would be abstract all logging calls
> into a superclass. this would perform a null check on the logger and
> the isXXXEnabled. it would also provide pre-parameterized calls:
>
> info(Object one)
> info(Object one, Object two)
> ...
Without even valuating your solution: I can't see the problem you're
trying to solve.
readability and ease of coding
(which is why the next generation logging systems use this formulation)
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
