Hi Noel, Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, let's consider next-major. As far as I know, we agree that the code in trunk will branch to be next-major. BUT, we also agree that there is code in trunk that may not survive the pruning. For example, perhaps none of the IMAP stuff survives to ship in next-major. We decide that in order to have a release in some timeframe, everything else is stable enough, but not certain other parts. Those issues would be resolved in trunk, but *not* resolved in next-major. Do you understand now why I am making this point? [JH>] If after the vote/discussion for the next-major feature set, there is such a case, we remove the label again. Where is the Problem? Kind regards Juergen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
