Mornin, I allready told you that it is an experiment. Nothing complete yet.. We not have found the solution yet we both happy with, thats why we not start a PROPOSAL and start workin on something to do some experiments ( thats why the sandbox is called handlerapi-experiment). Why you start complain about this ? Danny did the same with the mailet-api branch ..
We will for sure post a PROPOSAL if Stefano and me are happy with the api, but that will take some time... Believe me i will be happy to see your concerns about the experiment. So if you have some please tell us.. Maybe that will help us to fix some problems. bye Norman Noel J. Bergman schrieb: > I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype what he and > Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we develop code. Please > correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see a single message, much less a > discussion, of the ideas, plans, etc., for this code. > > As I understand it, the gist of it was to take the Handler API and merge in > the work that I had done on push model I/O. Apparently, they then decided > to adopt some of the ideas from QPSMTP for plugins. All fine and dandy, but > again, if this was not done in a collaborative manner involving the > community, I don't see it. If it is there, I apologize for missing it. > Please point it out so that I can respond to those discussions. Else I will > start new threads for people to discuss the code. > > Personally, I have some issues with the code, but nothing that can't be > corrected. > > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
