Stefano Bagnara schrieb: > Norman Maurer wrote: >> I add a HookResultHook which let developers hook in directly after each >> Hook return the HookResult... I used this hook now to let the >> JunkScoreHandler work again. This also give developers the possibilty >> to do generic stuff on DENY, OK (For example accounting) etc. > > I had no time to test this yet, but from a fast overview I like it! :-) > > We should probably move logging of ok/deny operations from specific > hooks to this Hook result interceptor. This sound like a good idea, but i have to think a bit more about this .. > > Furthermore I would probably use "HookResultHandler" or > "HookResultInterceptor" instead of "HookResultHook" as this shouldn't > be part of the "public hook api" (not needed for easy user-oriented > tasks). I think i not agree.. Why you want this not in the "public hook api" ? I think there are some use cases which whould need it. For example update a database on each DENY for graphing etc .. Or just for statistic generation. But i agree that the name is probally not the best.. > > Stefano > bye Norman
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
