On 1/15/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> i suspect that given good modularization, this choice could be made on
> a per-component basis whilst the core remained lowest common
> denominator JVM. james would then still run on older JVMs with small
> changes to the configuration files.
+1 That was the proposal the last time this sort of thing came up. For
example, if we want to implement STARTTLS, we need JDK 5 or later.
what would need to be done?
keep james/server as an integration layer and factor out all
implementation and core interfaces...?
keep everything within server and have src/java and src/java5...?
other options...?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
