On 1/17/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> Imho this is not a big issue: the link point to the apache james team >> page and the page show clearly an apache james project. > > Well, in fact the page has no obvious ("clear") indication that this > is an Apache James project. > Except of course, somebody looks at the linked URLs. > > BerndMaybe the author of that page chose by purpose to use only the final name of the library: no library have references to the company/organization. We never told him that "Stefano Bagnara, Norman Maurer" was the author of the library:
But you _are_ the authors, no way to deny this ;-)
Norman asked them to add jSPF and they added jSPF their own way. Btw I'll be happy with anything different you will agree with them. In the mean time you can also decide wether you/they want to add James Server to the "Mail Servers that natively support SPF" even if we only have this in trunk and not released it.
+1 for adding James. BTW, I am not at all trying to push my own opinions here, just trying to make it compliant with ASF rules. Everyone with a deeper understanding of ASF conventions and policies: please correct me where I might be wrong.
PS: Maybe you're also interested in this: http://www.dnsjava.org/ also links to jSPF without "Apache" or "James" in the description.
ok, I will have a look. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
