On 1/18/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO "handlerapi" should not be smtp specific: we use handler for every protocol. Maybe someone doesn't share this view, but I thought this was the main intent in calling "handler api". At least the pattern (if not the code) can be (and IMHO should be) reused between protocols.
That was indeed the intent, however we designed it to work for SMTP with no consideration of the requirements of the other protocols and as such there is a danger that it may *not* be as suitable as we first envisaged.
Danny, of course this is "my own view", I started the sentence with "Personally". Everyone should write his own idea to understand what is the group idea.
Yeah, I was acknowledging your right to express your view, my view is different but I didn't want you to think that I felt I was any more right or wrong than you. d --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
