robert burrell donkin schrieb: > there seems to be a rough consensus in favour of modularising james. > i've pulled together a document about one possible design > (http://wiki.apache.org/james/Development/Modularisation). this is > just one possible direction but this proposal is only about the first > step towards modularization. please start discussions about this > design on a separate thread. > > i'm convinced that modularisation is crucial for both technical and > community reasons. i hope that we can start down this roads whilst > discussing some of the later details. > > the most disruptive step will be pushing the existing codebase into a > subdirectory. IHMO for this, RTC is more appropriate than CTR. the > proposal is the first step towards modularisation: moving the existing > server code into a subdirectory so that other modules can be created > at the same level. > > i'm willing to implement. unless people jump in, I plan to execute on > saturday 11th feburary but this timing is not part of this proposal. > > i will tally this vote no earlier than 2400 GMT on wednesday, 7th > Feburary > > here's my +1 > > - robert > > PROPOSAL: > 1.1 move server/trunk -> server/trunk/pheonix-deployment > 1.2 create top level build which delegates to build.xml > > --8<------------------------------------------------------------- > [ ] +1 cool > [ ] +0 > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1 uncool > ------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Robert, Im happy to see you take care of some issues. Im not so famliar with ant ( I used more maven2 ;-) ) , but i think you know what you do ;-). So go ahead.. +1 bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
