On 2/9/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
> On 2/9/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 to http://www.apache.org/dist/james/jspf/beta/
>>
>> not "unstable"
>
> FWIW i've had bad experiences after dubbing releases (of this kind)
> 'beta'. i now strongly recommend using the 0.x convention (since it
> more accurately conveys the intent).
>
> - robert
I have no preferences: should we name the next release 0.9.5, using the
last number instead of the beta number?
Robert: is your note related also to the folder used to publish the
artifact or only to the name/number of the released artifact?
just naming and numbering
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
