On 2/1/07, David Woldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert, > <snip> >> >> and I want a lot more. I want mail and news servers in Geronimo too, >> and I want mailets that can call local EJB's that I can redeploy at will >> (or perhaps even make local EJB's that are themselves mailets.) > > mailets that are EJB sounds better than calling EJBs from mailets > > but POJOs with context sound even better (cool to mix in with service > buses etc) bit like activication specification message beans (mail is > just another message, after all) > Ah, I'm not sure what you are getting at here? "Service Bus" like an ESB? That would be nifty - they are great at shuttling messages about. Ok, what about using JMS throughout James instead of going the ESB route? One useful thing about JMS is that it builds your threadpools implicitly. One other useful thing is JMS would allow you to modularize and distribute pieces of James into separate plugins and improve scalability. If there isn't one already, making administration/configuration JMX or web consoles for James would be a nifty deal as well and being integrated with Geronimo would really spur that development.
still around dave? we've now made a start on the modularization and i've had time to think about this there is some really stuff which would be done in this area. not sure whether i'll find the cycles to hack it myself right now if you're still around and interested, maybe we could work together. WDYS? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
