Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Mime4j has general demonstrable performance problems: > http://buni.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137 > http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/01/27/Look-out-Its-behind-you > > > I'd suggest a general code review for the "byte at a time + buffered > input stream" anti-pattern > and general refactoring to do things in blocks where possible. > > -Andy Thanks for letting us know about the performance issues. According to the blog entry you're referring to the problems increase with the size of the message. I'm mainly using it to parse small spam mail which might be why I haven't had the same kind of performance problems. I'll certainly look into it.
-- Niklas Therning www.spamdrain.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
