+1 On 3/8/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Brewin schrieb: > Why not use the maximum VARCHAR size supported by the underlying DBMS as an > overridable default limit? When the limit is exceeded I cannot see a better > alternative than rejecting the message with "452 Requested action not taken: > insufficient system storage". The "bounce" seems perfectly reasonable > behaviour as every system ultimately has hard limits. > > We do need to validate that we can withstand a flood of such huge headers. > > Cheers > > -- Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
