On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > The automated build processes only use dist/james-${version}/downloads,
> > which holds the various release packages. The rest of the directory
> > structure is an unpackaged build for phoenix.
> i always found that structure a little confusing but maybe that's just me
:-/
Which structure? The only part I really need is the one directory listed
above.
having the release artifacts in dist/james-${version}/downloads. the
exploded pheonix directory feels to me like something that should live
in target, not dist. but this is just a comment, not an issue.
> in the medium term perhaps we might think about putting the master
> distributions directly into dist/james-${version}
Eliminating the download/ directory? That's not a problem, except that I
will need to modify my scripts to have a different set for the working
branches and the new trunk.
let's leave it for now
> BTW i'm not sure that i like the name 'stage' and think that perhaps
> 'lib' would be better. opinions?
Yes, lib/ is probably better than stage (referring to earlier topic). We
might want to distinguish between our own components and external
dependencies.
the directory uses the maven standard layout. so all james artifacts
are in the directory org.apache.james. good enough?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
