robert burrell donkin schrieb: > On 4/10/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> I don't know very well the fetchmail code by i think there is no special >> handling... >> >> I think the best solution whould to just deliver the message to the >> "normal" mailbox if such an error happen. > > that sounds very reasonable > > injecting an error transport sounds like a natural approach to the > coding. can anyone think of a better way? > > - robert >
For me it makes even more sense to do the same when using smtp... An error in sieve should not generate a bounce. The message should use the "normal" mailbox as fallback. Does this make sense for you ? bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
