Hi Jeffrey,

isn't it just possible to replace it with james 2.3.1 ? The release
canidat is allready released and the final version will come soon ( VOTE
is running).
We fixed many bugs since 2.2.0. So i whould try to upgrade.

If this is not possible in your case ( I hope it is) ,you could look at
the 2.3.1 source code for the needed changes. See:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/branches/v2.3/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/RemoteDelivery.java

Search for authUser ;-)

bye
Norman

Metcalf, Jeffrey M schrieb:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a requirement to use James 2.2.0 since it is bundled with a vendor 
> application.  My ISP blocks outgoing traffic on port 25 and requires me to 
> use an SMTP gateway on port 587 to send e-mail to the outside world.  
> Unfortunately they also require authentication and it does not seen that the 
> standard James 2.2.0 org.apache.james.transport.mailets.RemoteDelivery mailet 
> supports providing a username and password to the gateway feature.
>
> I browsed the source code and it looks like I can just augment the JavaMail 
> Session in the code with auth properties to accomplish this.  I am an 
> experienced Java developer but only have limited JavaMail experience, and if 
> someone has already done this, it would same me time if I could be directed 
> to a patch.  I'm sure my problem is quite common, so I am sure that there is 
> no shortage of patches out there.  Again my only limitation is the patch 
> would have to be applied to a 2.2.0 codebase since I am constrained by the 
> vendor application.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeffrey M. Metcalf
> Senior Advisor
> Technology Engineering
> Worldwide Technology and Business Innovation
> Pfizer Inc
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Office: (860) 686-1796
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> LEGAL NOTICE
> Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be 
> privileged.  It is intended for the addressee(s) only.  Access to this E-mail 
> by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not an addressee, any disclosure 
> or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) 
> in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful.  If you are not an 
> addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> !DSPAM:1,463006ec324321016014554!
>
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to