robert burrell donkin ha scritto: >> Do you think we can use "offline" perl mime-tools to generate expected >> results for our own (or from SpamAssassin corpus) mime messages so that >> we can then check mime4j gives the same result? What I mean: the output >> generated by a perl script licensed under the Artistic License what >> license have? I think it is only related to the license of the input >> file and not to the license of the processing/transorming tool, but can >> anyone confirm this? > > i'd need to take a look at the files generated by the tool to be sure. > generated files are not the products of a creative process and are > derived works of the meta-data. > > - robert
The input file is a mime message serialized. In output we have multiple files: - an XML representation of the mime message - a separate file for each decoded part. I think there is nothing "creative" in this process. Btw thinking at this a bit more I think we can simply keep using mime4j internal generator for everything. Then we only have to run a one time check using the perl tools to check that mime4j outputs and perl outputs are the same.. this is only an automated alternative to "manually" review expected results. Either way we don't need that stuff in the repository at all. I already removed most copyrighted stuff and I started creating some new test messages. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
