Well, just thinking, this being ASF. Shouldn't we eat our own dogfood...
If that would be so, than the entire ASF "messaging" infrastructure
should run on JAMES in *first* place, including newsgroups and mailing
lists (and this since years) :).
Well, that would at least dramatically increase the attention JAMES
would get. ;-)
Of course :). JAMES also brings attention to Apache, cause not all
users search Apache first than find JAMES: most of them search an email server,
than discover JAMES and then see that it's on Apache :).
If it would be good for ASF mail delivery - I would not like to put that
on a test. ASF is sending quite a lot of mails!
IMHO it would be the duty of the "JAMES team" to lobby this trial to the other
ASF members
to make a first try and get feedback what's required to be able to 100% run the entire ASF emails on
JAMES.
It would be the ultimate argument for every manager for adopting JAMES.
In the last 4 years, I was always had to hear: "if it's not even good for their
own use, why should
it be good enough for us?" :).
Ahmed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
