On 5/6/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> I skipped "tar.bz" packaging by purpose: having zip and tar.gz is IMHO
>> already redundant enough.
>
> Really? Personally, I am using ZIPs most of the time. But, unzip is
> still not available on every unix server (out-of-the-box). Also, I
> think some unixers might think that the zip distribution is not the
> appropriate one for them and get the feeling that their OS is not
> supported.
>
> Bernd
Why they should think the OS is not supported ? I think tar and gunzip
is aviable for all unix servers. Anyway I think tar.gz is enough for
unix/linux, but I have no problems with publish a tar.bz2 too ..
bye
Norman
sorry, I misread "tar.bz" as "tar.gz".
+1 for leaving it out.
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
