On 5/14/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you prefer "apache-james-mime4j-0.3.jar" or "apache-mime4j-0.3.jar" ?
In practice: when the project name is already in the james namespace
(server alone does not identify a james product, but jspf, jsieve,
mime4j, postage and mailet do) should we use "apache-" instead of
"james" or should we use both anyway?
I suggest the use of apache-mime4j because I don't like too much long
file names.
I'd prefer
Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
products on their own.
Furthermore JAMES Server is currently packaged as "james-" alone. I'd
like to use the "server" name and this proposal adds the apache prefix
so this should be named "apache-james-server-X.X.X-classifier.ext"
(classifier=bin|src, ext=zip|jar|tar.gz). About the modules jars
currently they are named like "james-server-imapserver-function".
In this case we should simply add the "apache-" prefix.
+1
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
