the subject of functional (black box) testing has been on my mind
recently. this arises from thinking about IMAP and about supporting
multiple variations on the same code base (for example, multiple mail
repositories).

a functional test suite is important for IMAP. IMHO simulating real
life email clients is the best way to ensure that JAMES IMAP works. it
would also be a reasonable gauge for performance and on implementation
completeness.

one way to integrate functional test suites into JAMES would be to
build artifacts in modules (either new or create new directories in
existing ones) containing the code required to perform function
testing. implementations and deployments would perform their
functional tests using these artifacts.

opinions?

other options?

-  robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to