Danny Angus ha scritto: > On 6/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Btw I'm not a big fan of localization of internet protocols: I never >> found an HTTP server returning "404 Non trovato" instead of "404 not >> found" ;-) > > That's probably because the standard doesn't account for it.
I know. But IMHO L8N belongs to clients: if I use the same client to access 10 different servers I expect to see the same message when I have errors. I think that SMTP DSN codes solution (ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES) is much better than localizing error messages on the server (I understand that this is not the place to discuss ietf IMAP proposals, but I wanted to share my opinion anyway). >> I think that l8n is really a low priority for our imap server >> (compliance, stability, compatibility, performance, extensibility are >> some of high priorities), but if you like to work on this and you find a >> clean way to handle l8n then this is welcome anyway. > > There's an internet draft (see earlier post) I saw the draft you linked previously: is there any client already supporting this? is there any server already supporting this? (sorry I've not googled for this, but maybe you already did this) Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
