robert burrell donkin ha scritto: > On 7/4/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You are right. Configuring JMX is no fun. >> While IMAP does define sufficient defaults (mostly the port) JMX has >> many configuration options (built-in JMX server vs. third party, >> authentication vs. no authenticaion, credentials, IP-bindings, ports, >> protocols...). Do you see any reasonable defaults? > > i wonder whether we might be able to do something funky with named > configurations. leave JMX off by default (for security reasons) but > ship several named configurations which can be started through the > remote manager.
Bernd is the man for JMX on JAMES ;-) , btw if I remember correctly to enable JMX you have to play with the phoenix's kernel.xml file, so it is a bit different from other JAMES Server configurations. Here is an interesting guide by Bernd: http://wiki.apache.org/james/ConfigureJmx Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
