On 7/12/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
> ATM JAMES has a lot of files which i think should have license header
> (see below for a list of candidates - i think i've removed all local
> files but there may be a few ones remaining)
>
> some of these are mea culpa and i'll fix them now
>
> i'm willing to fix the others but i thought it best to check with
> everyone that we're fine with the provenance of all this code. i'm
> reasonably sure that the others have just been missed when they were
> committed. however, please take a look at this list and shout if there
> are any files that were not contributed under a CLA.
xinfos have been written by us.
poms by me, but I changed them a lot locally... maybe I should simply
remember to add the headers for the next commit (you can also ignore
them, now)
The imap java classes have been contributed by Joachim (and we have a
grant IIRC).
The xml configuration files have been writte for JAMES and we released
them for years, so I'm almost sure we simply have to add the license.
about the package.html: do we need a license on those "almost empty" files?
thanks for the help
i'm starting to look at these issues now
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
