On 7/25/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess wrapper.conf is the configuration file for the wrapper, which > license and copyright is described in Wrapper.LICENSE.
good catch 8-) thanks > Does the fact that we took a Wrapper conf file and changed the property > values means that we added Intellectual value to the file? depends on the nature of the changes: were they creative enough? in this case, it's tough to be certain. in the case of uncertain, IMHO the best approach is to be clear about our intentions: apache intends that the apache license is used for it's works. WRAPPER.license allows sub-licensing (which is what we have done). if the JAMES changes were not creative enough to be copyrightable then a user can simply use the original license (if they prefer). however, if they were creative enough to be copyrightable and a header was not added then users would need to rely on an implied license. so on balance, it's best to err on the side of caution and give it have a header. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
