Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 8/1/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Then, wouldn't it be better to have this sar packager also in the binary >> build? > > i was planning to take the easy route and implement by just adding a > copy from a directory into the SAR when it's created
Don't worry, I understood this. I suggested the idea because it seemed more useful to me, and I know you are very comfortable with ant: and sometimes others have simple solutions to our complex ideas ;-) >> In fact it does not build anything from source: it only has to take the >> original SAR, replace the config.xml and add some library. >> >> Maybe the tool (another ant script) would also be useful to people >> downloading the binary distribution (well, in fact it is only a zip >> file, but I saw some user has problems working with it). > > i agree that a SAR manipulation tool would be useful for the binary > distribution. IIRC pheonix ships an ant task for this. would need to > think about whether documentation on customisation would be better > than an actual script. > > - robert Maybe it's time to split the sar generation from the phoenix-deployment. This way we could have a module building the sar and another module that takes the sar and place it in the phoenix distribution to create a binary build. The ant script used for this last action could be almost the same used by the binary distribution to create custom sar. I don't know if the api-library-function-deployment layers are enough to do that. Just another thought out of the box, Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
