Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > On 8/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>> On 8/5/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Am Sonntag, den 05.08.2007, 16:04 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Made some progress over the last days with the spring-deployment module. >>>>> I am currently working on making it ready to be run without further >>>>> adjustments after checkout and fit into the trunk infrastructure. >>>>> >>>>> There are still some tweaks I have here locally. But in general the >>>>> module is able to boot up James Server quite nicely. >>>>> >>>>> When ready, the module could simply be copied to a trunk checkout and be >>>>> run from there, or, after appropriate DISCUSS and successful VOTE, even >>>>> be moved to trunk as an experimental deployment. >>> IMHO CTR should be fine for experimental modules >> +1 For me it's easier to review code already committed than trying the >> merge on my side in order to have a preview of what we are discussing >> about/voting about. >> So CTR would be a win-win. > > I like the idea of ratifying by a vote the facts of introducing new > dependencies (spring.jar, maybe others) on TRUNK and having other > (experimental) deployments than pure Avalon. Simply to avoid the "late > veto" we had around here where changes where introduced by CTR without > raising any vetos at first and then later that code was > "vetoed-for-a-release", but was permitted to stay in TRUNK. > > Bernd
We know that even an unanimous vote can be invalidated by another vote the day after :-) BTW if you feel better voting before, you know that I have no problems with many votes, as long as people vote ;-) If you have better memory than me, can you point me to the fact you are referring to? (I don't remember it now, and I'd like to refresh my memory). Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
