Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > So the options we have are: 4) Another option is to simply remove the poms and to not declare the local stage folder as a maven repository in the main pom.xml. This way our internal "maven based" procedures will need to be online, but everything else is ok.
I refactored the lib folder to "stage" structure some weeks ago to have a self contained build for maven and to have a common structure in our product source folders and I saw no drawbacks at that time but having found this "licensing" issue with poms we could even evaluate reverting it (even if I still prefer #4 and #3 to #1, #2 or revert to lib folder). Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
