On 10/9/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip> > > but i'm still confused about what would be required than just adding > > NOTICE/LICENSE to the jars before they could be published in the maven > > repository > > Creating a pom.xml for them. yes (i had assumed that the pom's used to generate the website was correct) > And I always thought that adding a NOTICE/LICENSE to a jar means > creating a new release. ok - i see we were splitting semantics i would say that a vote is required to publish a new artifact as part of that release. others might say that a vote to release the artifact would be required. IOW a vote is required but a new version number is not > I saw projects creating a new release only > because the crc of the being-VOTED artifact changed because of a > different jar tool used to rebuid the jar... this usually depends on the process. if the vote is on an artifact then a new vote is required. <snip> > PS: Sorry, it's been a long work day and I get stressed when I'm not > able to explain in english something that is so clear to me. And really, > I don't have objection to application of #1, #2, #3, #4 or anything > else. I have preferences and I already said them, nothing more. I simply > have concern with your reasons for choosing one instead of the other and > I hope it's more clear now. Thank you for reading the whole thing. thanks for writing up your thought so thoroughly - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
