Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > is there any particular reason why JAMES shouldn't publish jars into > > the repository? > > > > - robert > > None that I'm aware of. > > The only problem is the ability to declare real dependencies of our > artifacts: I'm not sure that every dependency is available in official > maven repositories. But having the artifacts in a maven repository with > "partial" dependencies is IMHO better than not having the artifacts at all. > > Maybe we should use apache-mailet, apache-mailet-api and > apache-james-server as artifactIds for the 3 jars we released inside the > james.sar, so to follow the "apache-" prefix policy we used for mime4j, > jsieve and jspf. > > Also the sar could be published, but this is less useful than the jars, > so low priority. > > Stefano
Same here... And yes I think the apache- prefix whould be a good change. bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
