On 10/26/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > IIRC there has been some uncertainty about whether the pom.xml in the > > jsieve project is good enough to be published as meta-data into the > > repository. it looks ok-ish to me but i'm not a maven expert. > > hopefully those who know more will jump in. > > Now that we removed the stage repository references and that all of our > dependencies are officially published in a public maven repository I > think it's safe to use that pom.xml as descriptor.
great > > if we wanted to publish a future jsieve release through the repository: > > > > 1. what improvements would be needed to > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml ...? > > Maybe the disclaimer we added to pom.xml should be changed so to reflect > the fact that the pom is also used to publish the artifact to the maven > repository. done > > 2. would we need to publish the parent poms ...? > > They should be already public because we used them for previous jspf and > mime4j releases: > http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/ good - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
