On Nov 4, 2007 11:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > On Nov 2, 2007 12:54 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip> > >>>> Maybe the problem is that I don't know what the MailboxManager > >>>> responsibility and API users are/will be so I don't know what layer of > >>>> the architecture will be involved by this "API Design" thread. > >>> i agree that this is the major problem: we need to understand the use > >>> cases better > >>> > >>> - robert > >> Maybe you are the one that better know both the implementations we > >> currently have and the requirement for IMAP. > > > > Zsombor has made a start collecting requirements > > http://wiki.apache.org/james/BackendMailboxAPI > > I don't see references about what I/O should be supported by the > BackendMailboxAPI (BIO/NIO, SEDA/standard multithreaded). Had this been > left out by purpose at the current level of analysis? (this was touched on earlier) a well design API should be able to cope with these different approaches - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
