Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > what do we want to do about the stage directory? > it is not included, but needs to be to build out-of-the-box. > > AFAIR, there are stil some concerns about licensing. > we could exclude the related libs and include the others.
We probably will have to remove some pom or create our own. The same considerations I wrote about jSieve (before Robert noticed that we could simply remove the "problematic" dependencies) are valid for server. As far as I can tell no action has been taken to fix the pom licensing issue on the central maven repository. My last attempt to raise the issue there failed. JARs present in the stage folder should be all redistributable, so the problem is limited to the pom licensing. As you can see many of them do not have a license header (all of them, probably) and while some of them have been clearly created by ASF members for the ASF and we can (safely) think they are ASLv2 there are many of them for which we don't know the licensing and we can't redistribute them. Stefano > Bernd > > On Nov 11, 2007 7:20 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 6, 2007 1:21 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> if no one else jumps in soon, i'll go ahead and implement >> please take a look and check if i've missed anything >> >> - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
