This makes sense to me... +1 Norman
Am Dienstag, den 20.11.2007, 16:12 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Danny Angus (JIRA) ha scritto: > > [ > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543887 > > ] > > > > Danny Angus commented on JAMES-812: > > ----------------------------------- > > > > Should the version in JIRA be 3.0 or 3.0-SNAPSHOT ? > > > > if the major version is 3.0, then subsequent minor versions will be 3.0.x > > > > If it is 3.0-SNAPSHOT then presumably that would cover any unreleased > > version of 3.0? > > > > Comments? > > > IMHO it depends on how we intend to use JIRA. > > I'm used to use real product release versions as labels. > > So, I'd name it "3.0". When we'll be ready for 3.0b1 (or something > similar) we rename 3.0 to 3.0b1 and then we create a new 3.0 where we > move evey issue we don't plan to fix for 3.0b1. > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
