On Nov 24, 2007 4:53 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007 1:07 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/services/VirtualUserTableManagement.java > > and > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/management/VirtualUserTableManagement.java. > > i > > > > anyone know why? > > > > can one be removed? > > the phoenix config somehow requires an interface. this is one of the > quirks I found when working with this "IoC" container. > it is a convention (in James; maybe in Phoenix, too) to have all > service interfaces in this particular package. > of course, you'd want to have the implementation at the proper place. > > I agree with Danny, let's keep the names as-is, although it's a bit confusing.
why not call the implementation VirtualUserTableManager? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
