On Nov 25, 2007 6:34 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 25, 2007 6:06 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip> > > > 5 unsure about the granularity of avalon-user-function and > > > jdbc-user-function. lots of small components allows precision but > > > perhaps might be better to aggregate into large units including all > > > backend implementation of the same type. for example, > > > avalon-backend-function including all the avalon* implementations > > > (AvalonRepository and so on). > > > > > > opinions? > > > > IMO it's better to aggregate jdbc-user-function to avalon-user-function. > > why? i've adopted stefano's suggestion but a longer explanation would be appreciated - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
